NMOC Re: [Powderworks] Astrophysicist Worker
Mathias Hermansson
hermanator51 at hotmail.com
Thu Oct 30 03:37:25 MST 2003
If it counts, I am also a Master ocf Science in Engineering Physics who
studied som Astronomy, but not much. And yes, I have read some cosmology
(and some quantum physics as well), but now I have been working as a
computer guy for the last six years so I have forgotten most of that :-(
Just for the record.
/Herman
>
>I'm a software guy by profession, but physics in general
>and astrophysics in particular, especially as it relates
>to cosmology, are major interests of mine. Right now I'm
>slowly making my way through Martin Rees' "New Perspectives
>in Astrophysical Cosmology," which I had to put down for a
>while because my (signed!) copy of Wille's showed up. Well,
>hey, at least I have my priorities straight!
>
>I also like learning about particle physics and theory,
>although I'm nowhere near the math whiz I'd need to be to
>have any real depth of understanding in that field. But
>what the hell, it's still fascinating.
>
>What really interests me, though, is the juxtaposition of
>the two in the early universe, during and shortly after
>the Big Bang. In its first fraction of a second, the
>Universe was this incredibly dense, incredibly hot jumble
>of particles and radiation all flying around, expanding
>and cooling rapidly, and what really dominated at that time
>was the interactions between the particles and radiation.
>We can extrapolate backward from what we know today about
>those interactions, and we think we have a pretty good
>idea how things must've gone in the big bang, at least
>after the first ten-to-the-minus-thirtieth of a second.
>Those interactions determined the abundance of hydrogen
>and other light elements in the early universe, and the
>hydrogen gas started clumping togther in increasing
>amounts under gravitational attraction to form the first
>stars and galaxies. Heavier elements were forged inside
>those stars, and scattered around the universe when some
>of the stars ended their lives as supernovas. The
>gravitational clumping started again, this time with
>other elements mixed in with the hydrogen, and eventually,
>over a few more cycles, some of those clumps formed into
>solar systems and planets and stuff... and here we are.
>
>At least, that's what we think happened.
>
>So, if that's true, then quite literally, we are all
>made of stardust. Gotta love that!
>
>I could ramble on for hours about all of this stuff.
>It's all interesting to me, and there are just so many
>Big Questions in here. For example:
>
>How (or better, why) did the fundamental forces and laws
>of nature become established with the values and properties
>they have today, so that the universe could evolve the way
>it has, allowing the existence of conscious beings who are
>able to contemplate such ideas? If the strengths of any of
>the four forces had been even the tiniest bit different,
>we would not be here to think about it. Not in our current
>forms, anyway.
>
>Or, why are there so many different kinds of particles?
>Are they all just different forms of the same thing, as
>string theory suggests? What purpose do they serve, aside
>from intriguing scientists?
>
>Or, why do particles exhibit quantum behavior, anyway?
>Will we ever truly understand the wave-particle duality?
>
>Or, what causes the gamma-ray bursts we've been detecting?
>Something really big blowing up? Black holes eating stars?
>(Apparently it's a good thing we don't detect those any
>closer than we do.)
>
>Or, why does the universe appear to not only be expanding,
>but expanding at an increasing rate? What's up with THAT?
>
>Or, just what the hell is dark matter, anyway? Neutrinos?
>Something else? What? WHAT?
>
>It's all totally cosmic! And the more we learn, the
>weirder it gets.
>
>And my main regret about being mortal is that it's unlikely
>I'll ever find out the answers to most of those questions.
>
>Oh well... at least there's good music to listen to while
>I ponder the mysteries.
>
> o-o
> \_/ Andy
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Powderworks (on behalf of Patrick Collins)
>Subject: NMOC Re: [Powderworks] Astrophysicist Worker
>
>Sorry, it's not me, but I thought I was the only one. How many other
>astrophysicist powderworkers are there?
>
>Cheers,
>P.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Powderworks mailing list
>Powderworks at cs-lists.cs.colorado.edu
>http://cs-lists.cs.colorado.edu/mailman/listinfo/powderworks
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail