[Powderworks] INXS' new singer
Laura Wolfe
Laura Wolfe" <casalobo@lightspeed.net
Sun, 31 Mar 2002 13:52:19 -0800
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_005B_01C1D8BB.464CB240
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have to join in with those who support INXS' right to exist with a =
new singer, Jon Stevens. I thought the band would break up after =
Hutchence's death, but I was pleased to see my old friends with Stevens =
at the Sydney Olympics; they looked and sounded rejuvenated. Stevens =
seems like a good choice. Stevens should be able to handle Hutchence's =
vocals, which were distinctive but not unreproducible. I think another =
great choice for INXS would have been Dale Ryder of Boom Crash Opera. =
If you like INXS, you should get the first two BCO albums, "Boom Crash =
Opera" (1987) and "These Here Are Crazy Times" (1989). They were a =
great band for a while there, with two great songwriters (the guitarist =
and bassist) and a singer who was like a supercharged Hutchence (imagine =
MH blended with a younger Steven Tyler). Finally, although INXS =
eventually became an embarrassment to those of us who loved them in the =
early days, they really were a great band, especially live, from =
1980-1986 or so. I recommend "Shabooh Shoobah," "The Swing", and =
"Listen Like Thieves." (1981's "Underneath the Colours" is also =
excellent, if not quite fully formed.) From "Kick" on, they turned into =
an Americanized hitmaking machine that went nowhere fast. If =
keyboardist Andrew Farriss has any songs left in him (and I don't know =
if he does), they could still be a viable act. It all depends what Jon =
Stevens brings to the band besides his voice.
The death or departure of a singer should not necessarily doom a band. =
The worker who said they should split up since they're not the same band =
is possibly missing something: maybe they could be a slightly different =
band, but still be good. I for one think Led Zeppelin should have =
continued without John Bonham. Zep was essentially Page's guitar and =
songwriting with Plant's voice (not to diminish the brilliance of =
Bonzo's drumming). But they could have found a replacement, just as the =
Who did for Keith Moon (unfortunately, Kenney Jones was the wrong guy =
entirely); did you see/hear them at the MSG benefit for 9/11 with Zak =
Starkey (Ringo's son) on drums? Phenomenal, with spot-on drumming, like =
Moon but more musically adept.
I'm glad that Stephen Scott mentioned Marillion; most people wrote them =
off when Fish left in 1989, but Steve Hogarth saved the band. He is a =
vastly superior singer, songwriter, and musician to Fish, and he =
stimulated main writers Steve Rothery and Mark Kelly to their best work =
ever with 1994's "Brave" (which I highly recommend to Oil fans). They =
are still around and better than ever (check out last year's =
"Anoraknophobia" or next month's live CD, "Anorak in the UK"). And, of =
course, Genesis did quite well, artistically and commercially, when =
Collins took Gabriel's seemingly indispensable place. They weren't the =
same band, but they were quite similar and still quite good (at least up =
through 1978-80). Stephen also mentioned Van Halen, another good =
example (although I didn't care for either incarnation, I was in the =
minority). Deep Purple continued for quite a while with David Coverdale =
as lead singer in yet another "same but different" progression.
So it can be done, but it's got to be done carefully. The singer always =
has to be different somehow from the original singer, but not shockingly =
so (for example, Hogarth can sing Fish-era Marillion songs beautifully, =
and the same was true of Collins singing Gabriel-era songs). This was a =
bit of a problem for Coverdale in DP, who couldn't handle Ian Gillan's =
vocal parts to save his life, as he was basically a blues and soul =
singer at heart. But I think INXS has been away long enough that many =
people are ready to hear from them again. I look forward to hearing =
their new material, although my expectations are low (avoid =
disappointment, be pleasantly surprised instead).
Bill Wolfe
------=_NextPart_000_005B_01C1D8BB.464CB240
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have to join in with those who =
support=20
INXS' right to exist with a new singer, Jon Stevens. I thought the =
band=20
would break up after Hutchence's death, but I was pleased to see my old =
friends=20
with Stevens at the Sydney Olympics; they looked and sounded =
rejuvenated. =20
Stevens seems like a good choice. Stevens should be able to handle =
Hutchence's vocals, which were distinctive but not unreproducible. =
I think=20
another great choice for INXS would have been Dale Ryder of Boom Crash=20
Opera. If you like INXS, you should get the first two BCO albums, =
"Boom=20
Crash Opera" (1987) and "These Here Are Crazy Times" (1989). They =
were a=20
great band for a while there, with two great songwriters (the guitarist =
and=20
bassist) and a singer who was like a supercharged Hutchence (imagine MH =
blended=20
with a younger Steven Tyler). Finally, although INXS eventually =
became an=20
embarrassment to those of us who loved them in the early days, they =
really were=20
a great band, especially live, from 1980-1986 or so. I recommend =
"Shabooh=20
Shoobah," "The Swing", and "Listen Like Thieves." (1981's =
"Underneath the=20
Colours" is also excellent, if not quite fully formed.) From =
"Kick" on,=20
they turned into an Americanized hitmaking machine that went nowhere =
fast. =20
If keyboardist Andrew Farriss has any songs left in him (and I don't =
know if he=20
does), they could still be a viable act. It all depends what Jon =
Stevens=20
brings to the band besides his voice.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The death or departure of a singer =
should not=20
necessarily doom a band. The worker who said they should split up =
since=20
they're not the same band is possibly missing something: maybe they =
could be a=20
slightly different band, but still be good. I for one think Led =
Zeppelin=20
should have continued without John Bonham. Zep was essentially =
Page's=20
guitar and songwriting with Plant's voice (not to diminish the =
brilliance of=20
Bonzo's drumming). But they could have found a replacement, just =
as the=20
Who did for Keith Moon (unfortunately, Kenney Jones was the wrong guy =
entirely);=20
did you see/hear them at the MSG benefit for 9/11 with Zak Starkey =
(Ringo's son)=20
on drums? Phenomenal, with spot-on drumming, like Moon but more =
musically=20
adept.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm glad that Stephen Scott mentioned =
Marillion;=20
most people wrote them off when Fish left in 1989, but Steve Hogarth =
saved the=20
band. He is a vastly superior singer, songwriter, and musician to =
Fish,=20
and he stimulated main writers Steve Rothery and Mark Kelly to their =
best work=20
ever with 1994's "Brave" (which I highly recommend to Oil fans). =
They are=20
still around and better than ever (check out last year's =
"Anoraknophobia" or=20
next month's live CD, "Anorak in the UK"). And, of course, Genesis =
did=20
quite well, artistically and commercially, when Collins took Gabriel's =
seemingly=20
indispensable place. They weren't the same band, but they were =
quite=20
similar and still quite good (at least up through 1978-80). =
Stephen also=20
mentioned Van Halen, another good example (although I didn't care for =
either=20
incarnation, I was in the minority). Deep Purple continued for =
quite a=20
while with David Coverdale as lead singer in yet another "same but =
different"=20
progression.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>So it can be done, but it's got to be =
done=20
carefully. The singer always has to be different somehow from the =
original=20
singer, but not shockingly so (for example, Hogarth can sing Fish-era =
Marillion=20
songs beautifully, and the same was true of Collins singing =
Gabriel-era=20
songs). This was a bit of a problem for Coverdale in DP, who =
couldn't=20
handle Ian Gillan's vocal parts to save his life, as he was basically a =
blues=20
and soul singer at heart. But I think INXS has been away long =
enough that=20
many people are ready to hear from them again. I look forward to =
hearing=20
their new material, although my expectations are low (avoid =
disappointment, be=20
pleasantly surprised instead).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Bill Wolfe</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_005B_01C1D8BB.464CB240--