Midnight Oil

[Powderworks] Re: Powderworks Content

Alister Thomas a_thomas@bigpond.net.au
Wed, 16 Apr 2003 20:23:32 +1000


--=====================_3170468==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 12:04 AM 16/04/2003 -0400, Kate Parker Adams wrote:
>Powderworks -- Discussion of the music and politics of Midnight Oil
>p.s.  the caps lock is on the right side of the keyboard - just click to 
>disengage it.
>
>At 11:39 PM 4/15/03 -0400, Jonathan & Julie Hart wrote:
>>PLEASE TAKE THIS DISCUSSION TO POWDERPOLITICS!!!!!!

Thankyou (!!!) for pointing that one out (ie. music *AND* politics...).

If that's the description of the list's purpose, as it stands today, then 
it would be incorrect to assert the only place for political discussion 
would be Powderpolitics.

Indeed, I've recently joined Powderpolitics. It's very quiet, presently...

Alister 
--=====================_3170468==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
<body>
At 12:04 AM 16/04/2003 -0400, Kate Parker Adams wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font size=4><b>Powderworks --
Discussion of the music and politics of Midnight Oil</b></font> <br>
p.s.&nbsp; the caps lock is on the right side of the keyboard - just
click to disengage it.<br><br>
At 11:39 PM 4/15/03 -0400, Jonathan &amp; Julie Hart wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>PLEASE TAKE THIS DISCUSSION TO
POWDERPOLITICS!!!!!!</blockquote></blockquote><br>
Thankyou (!!!) for pointing that one out (ie. music *AND* politics...).
<br><br>
If that's the description of the list's purpose, as it stands today, then
it would be incorrect to assert the only place for political discussion
would be Powderpolitics.<br><br>
Indeed, I've recently joined Powderpolitics. It's very quiet,
presently...<br><br>
Alister</body>
</html>

--=====================_3170468==.ALT--